top of page


DUAL POLICY FRAMEWORK
ACCESS+CHOR (Community Anchored Housing Opportunity and Resilience)
 

Primary Theme: Public Policy & Advocacy 

 

Secondary Themes: Financial Management; Equity, Diversity & Inclusion (EDI); Governance & Leadership; Program Evaluation & Impact 

 

Geographic Focus: National (United States) 

 

Summary: The ACCESS+CHOR Resilience Package is a dual-policy framework that integrates two transformative initiatives:

  • ACCESS Act (Advancing Citizens’ Control of Earned Social Security): Allows early, limited access to up to 25% of an individual’s projected Social Security benefits during verified financial hardship. Includes safeguards, repayment mechanisms, and a refund reinvestment option to ensure long-term sustainability.

  • CHOR Act (Community Anchored Housing Opportunity and Resilience): Expands access to affordable, income-based housing while serving as a qualifying mechanism for ACCESS eligibility. CHOR-certified housing providers share rent burden data with SSA to streamline benefit access and ensure targeted relief.

 

Together, these policies create a scalable, data-driven, and fiscally responsible system that empowers individuals to use their earned benefits to maintain housing stability and economic dignity.  

 

Key Data Points: 

  • Over 50% of U.S. renters are cost-burdened

  • $40B+ in projected annual savings from reduced reliance on TANF, SNAP, and emergency housing

  • Every $1 in SSA benefits generates approximately $2 in economic output

  • $2.4B/year could be added to the SSA Trust Fund through voluntary tax refund reinvestment

  • ACCESS withdrawals are capped at 25% of projected SSA benefits and limited to five lifetime uses  

 

Policy Relevance: The ACCESS+CHOR framework addresses two of the most pressing challenges in the U.S.—financial insecurity and housing instability—by:

  • Enabling early access to earned Social Security benefits during verified hardship

  • Linking rent burden data to benefit eligibility

  • Reducing public assistance reliance through structured, earned-access mechanisms

  • Promoting equity by prioritizing underserved groups including gig workers, caregivers, and ALICE households

  • Encouraging interagency collaboration between SSA, HUD, and IRS

  • Supporting environmental sustainability and rural/tribal inclusion through CHOR housing incentives  

 

Implementation Strategy

  • Unified SSA Portal: Centralized access for both ACCESS and CHOR applications

  • Pilot Programs: Launch in diverse states with federal oversight

  • Emergency Clause: Expand access during national crises

  • Public Awareness Campaign: Multilingual, accessible outreach

  • Monitoring & Evaluation: KPIs include repayment rates, eviction reduction, and digital access equity

​

Author(s) / Organization: Shamirah D. Ross-Gowdy, B22 PARK, INC. 

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY  

(1.1.0) The Problem  

Millions of Americans face a dual crisis: financial insecurity and housing instability. Despite contributing to Social Security throughout their working lives, many individuals are unable to access their earned benefits during times of urgent need. Simultaneously, rising rents and stagnant wages have left over half of U.S. renters cost-burdened, with essential workers and low-income families disproportionately affected. Existing programs like Section 8 and TANF are underfunded, difficult to access, and often fail to provide timely or comprehensive support.  

 

(1.2.0) The Solution  

The ACCESS+CHOR Resilience Package is a dual-policy framework that integrates two transformative initiatives:  

 

  • ACCESS Act (Advancing Citizens’ Control of Earned Social Security): Allows early, limited access to up to 25% of an individual’s projected Social Security benefits during verified financial hardship. Includes safeguards, repayment mechanisms, and a refund reinvestment option to ensure long-term sustainability.  

 

How Projected Benefits Are Calculated 
Projected Social Security benefits are estimated using the Social Security Administration’s (SSA) standard formula, which considers: 

  • Average Indexed Monthly Earnings (AIME): Based on the 35 highest-earning years. 

  • Primary Insurance Amount (PIA): The monthly benefit at full retirement age. 

  • Retirement Age Adjustment: Early access reduces future benefits proportionally. 

  • Contribution Record: Includes all FICA-taxed earnings. 

 

For the purposes of the ACCESS Act, the SSA will calculate 25% of the total current earnings as the maximum early access cap. 

 

  • CHOR Act (Community Anchored Housing Opportunity and Resilience): Expands access to affordable, income-based housing while serving as a qualifying mechanism for ACCESS eligibility. CHOR-certified housing providers share rent burden data with SSA to streamline benefit access and ensure targeted relief.  

 

(1.2.1) Sample Scenario Example 

Name: Maria, Age 45  
Earnings: $45,000/year  
Total Current Benefit: $324,000  
25% Early Access Cap: $81,000  

Maria applies for early access due to verified rent hardship. She withdraws $10,000. Over the next 3 years:  

 

  • $3,000 is repaid via tax refunds.  

  • $2,000 via voluntary payroll deductions.  

  • Remaining $5,000 is deducted from her future SSA benefits. 

 

Together, these policies create a scalable, data-driven, and fiscally responsible system that empowers individuals to use their earned benefits to maintain housing stability and economic dignity. 

 

(1.2.2) Repayment Tracking and Prioritization  

To ensure transparency and fiscal responsibility, the ACCESS Act will implement a structured repayment tracking system:  

  • Refund Routing Protocol: The IRS will prioritize repayment of ACCESS withdrawals by automatically allocating a portion of federal tax refunds before any reinvestment contributions are processed. This ensures that borrowed funds are repaid before optional contributions are applied.  

  • SSA Refund Ledger: A centralized ledger maintained by the SSA will track repayment progress for each participant, integrating data from IRS tax filings and employer-reported payroll deductions.  

  • User Dashboard: Beneficiaries will have access to a secure online portal showing their repayment status, remaining balance, and projected impact on future benefits.  

  

(1.2.3) Lifetime Access Cap  

To preserve the long-term solvency of the Social Security Trust Fund and prevent overuse, the following lifetime access limits will apply:  

  • Maximum Access Frequency: Individuals may access early SSA benefits under the ACCESS Act no more than five times in their lifetime.  

  • Minimum Interval: A minimum of 1-2 years must pass between approved withdrawals. Allow additional withdrawals if prior amounts are fully repaid within a shorter window.  

  • Hardship Reassessment: Each request must be accompanied by updated documentation of financial hardship and rent burden.  

 

These safeguards ensure that early access remains a tool for genuine hardship, not routine financial planning. 

 

(1.3.0) Key Benefits Summary  

  • Empowers Earned Access: Allows early, limited access to Social Security benefits during verified financial hardship.  

  • Stabilizes Housing: Links rent burden data to benefit eligibility, preventing eviction and homelessness.  

  • Boosts Economic Output: Every \$1 in SSA benefits generates approximately \$2 in economic activity.  

  • Reduces Public Assistance Reliance: Projected to save over \$40 billion annually in TANF, SNAP, and emergency housing costs.  

  • Supports Essential Workers: Improves housing proximity, job retention, and financial resilience.  

  • Protects SSA Trust Fund: Includes repayment mechanisms and dynamic caps to ensure long-term sustainability.  

  • Promotes Equity: Prioritizes underserved groups including gig workers, caregivers, and ALICE households. 

 

(1.4.0) The Impact  

  • Economic Resilience: Every $1 in Social Security benefits generates approximately $2 in economic output. The proposal is projected to reduce reliance on TANF, SNAP, and emergency housing programs by over $40 billion annually.  

  • Workforce Stability: CHOR housing supports essential workers by reducing commute times and improving retention. ACCESS funds help individuals avoid eviction, maintain employment, and recover from financial shocks.  

  • Fiscal Sustainability: Refund-based repayment and voluntary reinvestment mechanisms offset early withdrawals, preserving the integrity of the Social Security Trust Fund.  

  • Equity and Empowerment: The proposal prioritizes underserved populations, including gig workers, caregivers, and ALICE households, offering a dignified alternative to traditional welfare programs.  

 

(1.5.0) Why Now?  

The ACCESS+CHOR Resilience Package responds to a critical moment in American economic history. In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, inflation, and a national housing affordability crisis, millions of Americans are living paycheck to paycheck — despite contributing to the Social Security system for years.  

  • Over 50% of renters are cost-burdened, and eviction rates are rising.  

  • Gig workers and low-wage earners lack access to traditional safety nets.  

  • Public trust in government programs is eroding due to inaccessibility and inefficiency.  

 

This proposal offers a timely, bipartisan solution that restores dignity, promotes economic mobility, and modernizes two of the nation’s most vital systems: Social Security and affordable housing. It is not just a policy — it is a promise fulfilled. 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

2.0 POLICY: CHOR Act (Community Anchored Housing Opportunity and Resilience)  

(2.1.0) Purpose  

CHOR (Community Anchored Housing Opportunity and Resilience) Act is a dual-purpose housing policy that not only promotes affordable, inclusive, and stable housing but also serves as a qualifying mechanism for early access to Social Security benefits under the ACCESS Act.  

  

(2.2.0) Integration with ACCESS  

  • SSA Rent Relief Option: Renters in CHOR-supported housing who pay more than 30% of their income on rent automatically qualify for early withdrawal of up to 25% of their projected Social Security benefits under the ACCESS Act.  

  • Repayment Synergy: Tax refunds used to repay rent-related withdrawals before reinvestment. The amount unpaid will be deducted from future Social Security benefits until repaid from either accruing income tax withholdings and/or tax refunds - bringing it back to the original balance. 

  • Shared Metrics: CHOR’s rent burden data is securely shared with the SSA to streamline ACCESS eligibility verification and reduce administrative burden.  

  
(2.3.0) Benefits of Integration  

(2.3.1) Pros  

  • Streamlined Eligibility  

    • Renters already vetted through CHOR’s income-based rent models are pre-qualified for ACCESS hardship criteria.  

    • Reduces paperwork and speeds up benefit disbursement.  

  • Targeted Relief  

    • Ensures that Social Security withdrawals are used for a critical need: housing stability.  

    • Prevents homelessness and displacement in high-rent areas.  

  • Data-Driven Policy  

    • CHOR’s rent-to-income tracking feeds into SSA systems, improving accuracy and fraud prevention.  

  • Cross-Program Efficiency  

    • Reduces duplication of services between HUD, SSA, and IRS.  

    • Encourages interagency collaboration and smarter use of federal resources.  

  • Empowered Tenants  

    • Renters gain both housing support and financial autonomy through access to their earned benefits. 

 

(2.4.0) Tenant Protections and Anti-Displacement Standards  
To ensure that CHOR-certified housing providers uphold the spirit of the program and protect vulnerable tenants, the CHOR Act should include enforceable tenant protection standards. These should include:  

  • Anti-Displacement Guarantees: Prohibit evictions without just cause and require relocation assistance in cases of redevelopment or conversion.  

  • Rent Stabilization Measures: Limit annual rent increases for CHOR units to a reasonable percentage tied to inflation or local wage growth.  

  • Tenant Rights Education: Require CHOR housing providers to distribute clear, multilingual materials outlining tenant rights and grievance procedures.  

  • Fair Housing Compliance: Mandate regular audits to ensure compliance with the Fair Housing Act and local anti-discrimination laws.  

 

These protections will help prevent unintended consequences such as gentrification, displacement, or exploitation, and will reinforce the program’s commitment to housing stability and equity. 

 

(2.4.1) CHOR Certification and Oversight  

To ensure quality, accountability, and alignment with the goals of the CHOR Act, the following mechanisms will govern the selection and monitoring of CHOR-certified housing providers:  

  • Certification Criteria: Housing providers must demonstrate compliance with income-based rent models, affordability thresholds, and data-sharing capabilities. Certification will be administered by HUD in coordination with local housing authorities.  

  • Annual Compliance Audits: Certified providers will undergo annual audits to verify adherence to affordability standards, tenant protections, and fair housing laws.  

  • Performance-Based Renewal: Certification will be valid for three years, with renewal contingent on meeting key performance indicators such as tenant satisfaction, rent-to-income ratios, and eviction rates.  

  

(2.4.2) Tenant Feedback and Grievance Resolution  

To uphold tenant rights and ensure continuous improvement, CHOR-certified providers must implement:  

  • Tenant Advisory Councils: Each CHOR development will establish a tenant council to provide feedback, raise concerns, and participate in housing policy discussions.  

  • Grievance Resolution Mechanism: A standardized, multilingual grievance process will be required, including:  

  • Anonymous complaint submission options.  

  • Timely response and resolution timelines.  

  • Escalation pathways to HUD or local housing authorities if unresolved.  

  • Annual Tenant Satisfaction Surveys: Results will be publicly reported and used to inform recertification and policy adjustments. 

 

(2.5.0) Challenges and Solutions of ACCESS+CHOR Integration  

While the integration of the CHOR and ACCESS Acts offers transformative potential, it also introduces several operational and policy challenges. Below is a breakdown of these challenges, followed by practical solutions to ensure the success and sustainability of the combined framework.  

 

(2.5.1) Challenge 1: Data Privacy and Security  

Sharing rent burden data between CHOR housing programs and the Social Security Administration (SSA) raises valid concerns about data privacy and the protection of sensitive personal information.  

 

Solution:  

  • Implement encrypted, consent-based data sharing protocols.  

  • Use secure APIs to transmit only essential data.  

  • Require tenant opt-in with clear disclosures on how data will be used.  

 

(2.5.2) Challenge 2: Administrative Complexity  

Coordinating across multiple federal agencies — SSA, HUD, IRS, and local housing authorities — can create logistical and bureaucratic hurdles.  

 

Solution:  

  • Establish a federal interagency task force to oversee integration.  

  • Pilot the integration in a few states to refine workflows before national rollout.  

  • Leverage existing SSA and HUD infrastructure to minimize new system development.  

 

(2.5.3) Challenge 3: Overuse of Social Security Funds  

There is a risk that widespread use of SSA withdrawals for rent relief could accelerate depletion of the Social Security Trust Fund.  

 

Solution:  

  • Cap withdrawals at 25% of projected benefits and limit access to once every 1-2 years.  

  • Prioritize repayment through tax refunds and voluntary payroll deductions.  

  • Monitor usage trends and adjust eligibility thresholds as needed.  

 

(2.5.3.1) Risk Mitigation for Fraud and Abuse  

To protect the integrity of the ACCESS+CHOR framework and ensure that benefits are distributed fairly and responsibly, the following safeguards will be implemented:  

  • AI/ML-Based Anomaly Detection: The SSA and HUD will deploy machine learning algorithms to flag irregularities in rent burden claims, such as sudden income changes, duplicate applications, or outlier rent-to-income ratios. These tools will help identify potential fraud while minimizing false positives.  

  • Cross-Agency Data Validation: Real-time data sharing between SSA, HUD, IRS, and CHOR-certified housing providers will enable automated cross-checks of income, rent payments, and tax filings. This will reduce administrative burden and enhance verification accuracy.  

  • Fraud Penalties and Enforcement:  

  • For Applicants: Individuals found to have knowingly submitted false information may be disqualified from future ACCESS withdrawals and subject to repayment with penalties.  

  • For Housing Providers: CHOR-certified landlords or developers who falsify rent data or eligibility documentation may lose certification, face fines, and be barred from future federal housing programs.  

 

These measures will ensure that the program remains fiscally sound, equitable, and trusted by the public. 

 

(2.5.3.2) Dynamic Risk Controls  
To further safeguard the Social Security Trust Fund, the ACCESS Act could incorporate dynamic caps or usage thresholds that adjust based on macroeconomic indicators. For example:  

  • During periods of high unemployment or economic recession, access thresholds could be temporarily tightened to prevent mass withdrawals.  

  • Conversely, in times of economic stability, access could be slightly expanded to support proactive financial resilience.  

 

These adaptive mechanisms would allow the program to remain responsive to national economic conditions while preserving long-term fund integrity. The SSA, in coordination with the Department of Labor and the Federal Reserve, could establish a data-driven formula to guide these adjustments. 

 

(2.5.4) Challenge 4: Equity and Access Gaps  

Renters in non-CHOR housing may feel excluded from the benefits of the ACCESS+CHOR integration, potentially creating disparities.  

 

Solution:  

  • Expand CHOR eligibility to include similar housing programs that meet affordability and data-sharing standards.  

  • Create a certification process for qualifying housing providers outside the CHOR network.  

  • Offer a parallel ACCESS pathway for renters who can independently verify rent burden.  

 

(2.5.5) Challenge 5: Public Perception and Political Resistance  

Some stakeholders may view the integration as an overreach or fear it undermines the long-term purpose of Social Security.  

 

Solution:  

  • Frame the policy as a structured, earned-access program — not an entitlement.  

  • Emphasize that funds are only accessible in verified hardship situations and are repaid and/or deducted from future benefits.  

  • Launch a public education campaign highlighting success stories and economic benefits. 

 

(2.6.0) Economic Impact of ACCESS+CHOR Integration  

1. Stimulates Local Economies  

  • Renters with stable housing and access to funds are more likely to spend locally.  

  • Every \$1 in Social Security benefits generates approximately \$2 in economic output (SSA Multiplier Effect).  

 

2. Reduces Public Assistance Costs  

  • Fewer evictions and housing crises reduce reliance on emergency shelters, TANF, and SNAP.  

  • Estimated \$40B+ in annual savings across federal aid programs (ACCESS Act projections).  

 

3. Encourages Workforce Participation  

  • Stable housing enables renters to maintain employment or pursue training.  

  • CHOR’s proximity-based housing for essential workers improves retention and productivity.  

 

4. Attracts Private Investment  

  • Developers are incentivized to build CHOR-compliant housing, knowing tenants have access to SSA-backed rent relief.  

  • Public-private partnerships (PPPs) are strengthened by reduced tenant default risk.  

 

5. Long-Term Fiscal Sustainability  

  • Refund reinvestment and repayment mechanisms offset SSA withdrawals.  

  • Reduced demand for crisis-based aid leads to more predictable federal budgeting. 

 

(2.7.0) Private Sector Engagement Strategy  
To scale CHOR housing and reduce public sector burden, the proposal encourages robust private sector participation through:  

  • Impact Investment Opportunities: Offer social bonds or housing equity funds that allow private investors to support CHOR-certified developments with measurable social returns.  

  • CHOR Developer Certification: Create a federal certification program that grants tax credits, zoning bonuses, and expedited permitting to developers who meet CHOR affordability and data-sharing standards.  

  • Employer-Sponsored Housing Incentives: Provide matching grants or tax deductions to employers who invest in workforce housing or subsidize rent for employees in CHOR units. 

 

(2.8.0) Environmental Sustainability Incentives  

To align with national climate goals and promote long-term resilience, the ACCESS+CHOR Resilience Package encourages environmentally sustainable development through the following measures:  

  • Green Building Standards: CHOR-certified developers will be incentivized to meet or exceed recognized environmental benchmarks such as:  

  • LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) certification  

  • ENERGY STAR certification for energy-efficient construction and appliances  

  • Enterprise Green Communities Criteria for affordable housing  

  • Federal Green Infrastructure Integration:  

  • CHOR developments that incorporate renewable energy systems, green roofs, or water conservation technologies will be prioritized for funding through existing federal programs such as:  

  • HUD’s Green and Resilient Retrofit Program (GRRP)  

  • Department of Energy’s Weatherization Assistance Program (WAP)  

  • EPA’s Environmental Justice Grants  

  • Sustainability Scoring in CHOR Certification:  

  • Environmental performance will be included as a scoring criterion in CHOR certification and renewal evaluations, encouraging continuous improvement in building efficiency and climate resilience.  

 

These incentives will reduce long-term utility costs for tenants, lower carbon emissions, and position CHOR housing as a model for sustainable, community-centered development. 

 

(2.9.0) Expanding Case Study Representation: Rural and Tribal Communities  

To ensure geographic equity and demonstrate the adaptability of the ACCESS+CHOR framework, the proposal elevates rural and tribal housing initiatives from a future priority to a core implementation focus:  

  • Rural Workforce Housing Pilots: Launch targeted pilot programs in agricultural, manufacturing, and healthcare hubs in rural regions, in partnership with local employers and housing cooperatives.  

  • Tribal Housing Integration: Collaborate with Tribal Housing Authorities to adapt CHOR principles within the framework of the Native American Housing Assistance and Self Determination Act (NAHASDA), ensuring cultural relevance and sovereignty.  

  • Regional Equity Grants: Allocate federal grants to support infrastructure development and CHOR certification in underserved rural and tribal areas, including the Appalachian and Delta regions.  

 

These efforts will ensure that the ACCESS+CHOR model is inclusive, scalable, and responsive to the unique challenges of non-urban communities.  

  

(2.10.0) Strategy for Engaging Small and Mid-Sized Employers  

Recognizing that small and mid-sized businesses (SMBs) are vital to local economies, the proposal includes a tailored engagement strategy:  

  • CHOR Employer Partnership Toolkit: Develop a resource guide for SMBs outlining how to participate in CHOR housing initiatives, including tax incentives, matching grants, and employee retention benefits.  

  • Local Chamber Collaborations: Partner with chambers of commerce and regional economic development agencies to promote CHOR participation among SMBs.  

  • Flexible Contribution Models: Allow SMBs to contribute to workforce housing through pooled funds, shared equity models, or in-kind support (e.g., land, services).  

  • Recognition and Branding: Create a federal “CHOR Workforce Champion” designation to publicly recognize employers who invest in housing stability for their employees. 

POLICY: CHOR Act

3.0 THE COLLABORATION: ACCESS+CHOR  

(3.1.0) How They Complement Each Other  

  • Shared Infrastructure  

    • The ACCESS Act already proposes IRS–SSA coordination, secure data pipelines, and SSA ledger updates.  

    • The rent relief model can plug into this system with minimal additional overhead.  

  • Unified Eligibility Portal  

    • A single SSA portal could allow users to apply for general hardship access (ACCESS Act) or rent-specific relief (Rent Relief Model), streamlining the user experience.  

  • Stronger Fiscal Sustainability  

    • The ACCESS Act’s refund reinvestment mechanism can help offset the rent relief borrowing, especially if repayments are prioritized before reinvestment.  

  • Broader Impact  

    • ACCESS addresses a wide range of hardships; the rent relief model zooms in on housing insecurity—together, they provide a comprehensive safety net.  

 

(3.2.0) Technology and Accessibility Standards  
To ensure equitable access to the unified SSA portal, the system must be designed with inclusivity at its core. This includes:  

  • ADA Compliance: The portal should meet or exceed Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG 2.1) to ensure usability for individuals with visual, auditory, cognitive, or motor impairments. 

  • Multilingual Interface: Offer full functionality in multiple languages to accommodate non-English speakers.  

  • Offline Access Options: Provide paper-based applications and in-person assistance through SSA field offices, libraries, and community centers for individuals without reliable internet access.  

  • Mobile Optimization: Ensure the portal is fully functional on smartphones and tablets, which are often the primary internet access point for low-income users.  

 

These measures will help bridge the digital divide and ensure that all eligible individuals — regardless of ability or connectivity — can access the benefits they’ve earned.  

 

(3.2.1) Tax Refund Forecasting for Repayment Planning  

To enhance financial transparency and empower beneficiaries with proactive planning tools, the ACCESS+CHOR framework will incorporate a Tax Refund Forecasting System. This system will:  

  • Estimate Future Refunds: Use historical IRS refund data to project future tax refunds for each participant.  

  • Simulate Repayment Scenarios: Allow users to model how different repayment percentages (e.g., 10%, 20%, 30%) would affect their annual refund and repayment timeline.  

  • Personalized Planning: Provide a year-by-year repayment schedule based on the user’s projected refund and selected repayment rate.  

  • Informed Withdrawals: Help applicants assess how much they can responsibly withdraw from their SSA benefits without compromising future financial stability.  

 

This tool will be integrated into the SSA’s user dashboard, ensuring that every ACCESS participant can make informed, data-driven decisions about their benefit usage and repayment strategy. 

 

(3.3.0) Projected Benefits of Integration  

  • Administrative Efficiency: Shared systems reduce duplication.  

  • Greater Reach: Rent relief expands ACCESS’s impact to a broader population.  

  • Improved Repayment Rates: Refund-based repayment ensures sustainability.  

  • Stronger Political Case: A dual-policy approach shows both compassion and fiscal responsibility. 

 

(3.4.0) Implementation Strategy  

  • Amend the ACCESS Act to include “rent burden exceeding 30% of income” as a qualifying hardship.  

  • Add a Rent Relief Module to the SSA’s early access application portal.  

  • Prioritize Refund Routing: Tax refunds first repay rent relief borrowing, then contribute to SSA reinvestment.  

  • Joint Pilot Program: Test both policies in the same states to evaluate combined impact and administrative efficiency.  

  • Unified Public Awareness Campaign: Educate citizens on their right to access earned benefits for both general and housing-specific needs. 

 

(3.5.0) Contingency Planning for State Participation  

To ensure national equity and continuity of service, the ACCESS+CHOR framework includes a contingency plan for states that opt out or delay participation:  

  • Federal Direct Access Option: Eligible individuals in non-participating states may apply directly through a federally administered SSA portal, bypassing state-level housing certification.  

  • Portable CHOR Certification: Tenants in CHOR-certified housing located in participating states retain eligibility even if they relocate to a non-participating state, provided their rent burden remains above 30%.  

  • Incentive Alignment: States that delay implementation may receive reduced federal housing grants or be deprioritized for future infrastructure funding tied to housing affordability.  

 

(3.6.0) Emergency Response Integration  

To ensure the ACCESS+CHOR framework remains responsive during times of national crisis, the proposal includes a built-in emergency response clause:  

  • Temporary Expansion Authority: During federally declared emergencies (e.g., natural disasters, pandemics, economic recessions), the SSA and HUD, in coordination with FEMA and the Department of Treasury, may temporarily:  

  • Expand ACCESS withdrawal limits beyond the standard 25% cap.  

  • Waive or adjust eligibility thresholds for CHOR certification and rent burden.  

  • Expedite application processing timelines and documentation requirements.  

  • Sunset and Oversight: Emergency provisions will be time-limited (e.g., 6–12 months) and subject to renewal based on ongoing need. All temporary expansions will be reviewed by the Policy Innovation Council and reported to Congress.  

  • Disaster Recovery Alignment: CHOR-certified housing providers will be eligible for priority access to federal disaster recovery funds and infrastructure grants to support rapid housing stabilization in affected communities.  

 

This clause ensures that the ACCESS+CHOR model can serve as a resilient safety net during times of extraordinary need. 

  

(3.7.0) Timeline for Interagency Data-Sharing and System Development  

To support seamless integration and secure data exchange, the following timeline is proposed:  

  • Year 1, Q1–Q2: Establish interagency task force (SSA, HUD, IRS); define data-sharing standards and legal frameworks.  

  • Year 1, Q3–Q4: Develop secure APIs and consent-based data protocols; begin SSA–HUD–IRS system integration.  

  • Year 2, Q1-Q4: Launch pilot data-sharing; test real-time eligibility verification and refund routing. Evaluate pilot performance; refine systems based on feedback.  

  • Year 3: Full national rollout of integrated data systems and unified SSA portal. 

 

(3.8.0) Expanded Public Communication and Digital Literacy Strategy  
To ensure equitable access and understanding of the ACCESS+CHOR Resilience Package, a comprehensive public education strategy should be developed. This strategy should include:  

  • Multilingual Outreach: Materials and application instructions should be available in the top 10 most commonly spoken languages in the U.S., including Spanish, Chinese, Vietnamese, Tagalog, and Arabic.  

  • Digital Literacy Support: Partner with libraries, community centers, and nonprofits to offer workshops and one-on-one assistance for navigating the SSA portal and understanding eligibility. 

  • Culturally Responsive Messaging: Tailor outreach campaigns to resonate with diverse communities, including gig workers, caregivers, and immigrant populations.  

  • Accessible Formats: Ensure all digital and print materials meet ADA accessibility standards, including screen reader compatibility and large-print versions.  

 

These efforts will help maximize participation, reduce misinformation, and build public trust in the program. 

 

(3.8.1) Media Engagement Plan  

To amplify awareness and build trust across diverse communities, the ACCESS+CHOR Resilience Package will include a proactive media engagement strategy:  

  • Community Media Partnerships: Collaborate with trusted local radio stations, ethnic media outlets, and neighborhood newspapers to disseminate information in culturally relevant formats.  

  • Influencer and Advocate Networks: Engage community leaders, faith-based organizations, and social media influencers to serve as program ambassadors.  

  • Earned Media Campaigns: Pitch human-interest stories and success narratives to regional and national media to highlight the program’s impact.  

  • Public Service Announcements (PSAs): Develop multilingual PSAs for television, radio, and digital platforms to explain eligibility and application steps.  

 

(3.8.2) Outreach Effectiveness Metrics  

To ensure accountability and continuous improvement, the following metrics will be tracked and reported quarterly:  

  • Awareness Rate: Percentage of target population aware of the ACCESS+CHOR program (measured via surveys).  

  • Application Rate: Number of applications submitted relative to estimated eligible population.  

  • Engagement Rate: Click-through and conversion rates from digital outreach campaigns.  

  • Equity Reach Index: Demographic breakdown of applicants to assess reach across racial, geographic, and socioeconomic lines.  

  • Community Partner Activation: Number of active outreach partners and events held.  

 

These metrics will inform adjustments to outreach strategies and ensure that communication efforts are inclusive, effective, and data-driven. 

 

(3.9.0) Built-In Innovation and Feedback Loops  
To ensure the ACCESS+CHOR framework remains responsive and effective over time, the following mechanisms are recommended:  

  • Policy Innovation Council: Establish a federal advisory body composed of SSA, HUD, IRS, academic experts, and community stakeholders to oversee pilot outcomes and recommend iterative improvements.  

 

Community Advisory Board for Policy Evolution  

To ensure that the ACCESS+CHOR framework remains grounded in lived experience and community insight, the proposal recommends the creation of a Community Advisory Board (CAB):  

  • Composition: The CAB will include renters, essential workers, caregivers, gig economy participants, and representatives from marginalized communities.  

  • Function: The board will meet quarterly to review program data, share user experiences, and propose policy refinements.  

  • Integration: Recommendations from the CAB will be formally reviewed by the Policy Innovation Council and considered in annual program updates and legislative revisions.  

 

This structure ensures that those most affected by housing and financial insecurity have a direct voice in shaping the policies designed to support them.  

  

Inclusive Pilot Program Design  

To promote equity from the outset, the pilot phase of the ACCESS+CHOR Resilience Package will include:  

  • Targeted Outreach: Engage community-based organizations, tribal governments, and advocacy groups to co-design pilot implementation strategies.  

  • Participatory Planning: Host design workshops and listening sessions with marginalized populations to identify barriers and tailor solutions.  

  • Equity Impact Assessments: Require each pilot site to conduct an equity audit before launch, ensuring that program design aligns with local needs and avoids unintended exclusions.  

 

These strategies will help ensure that the pilot programs are inclusive, culturally responsive, and effective across diverse communities.  

  

  • Sunset Clause and Review Period: Include a 5-year review clause for key provisions, allowing Congress to assess impact and reauthorize or revise as needed.  

  • State-Level Customization: Permit states to tailor implementation details (e.g., rent burden thresholds, repayment incentives) within federal guardrails to reflect local housing markets and administrative capacity. 

 

(3.10.0) Implementation Timeline  

To ensure a smooth and scalable rollout of the ACCESS+CHOR Resilience Package, the following phased implementation strategy is recommended:  

 

(3.10.1) Year 1: Planning and Infrastructure  

  • Draft and introduce legislation in Congress.  

  • Establish interagency task force (SSA, HUD, IRS).  

  • Develop secure data-sharing protocols and eligibility systems.  

  • Identify pilot states and CHOR-certified housing partners.  

 

(3.10.2) Year 1-2: Pilot Program Launch  

  • Launch pilot in multiple areas with diverse demographics.  

  • Begin early SSA access for rent-burdened CHOR tenants.  

  • Monitor participation, repayment rates, and housing stability.  

  • Conduct public awareness campaigns and stakeholder training.  

 

(3.10.3) Year 2-3: Evaluation and Expansion  

  • Conduct third-party audits and academic evaluations.  

  • Refine eligibility, repayment, and data systems based on pilot feedback.  

  • Expand CHOR certification to additional housing providers.  

  • Begin phased national rollout.  

 

(3.10.4) Year 3–4: National Scaling  

  • Full integration of ACCESS and CHOR across all states.  

  • Launch unified SSA portal for hardship and rent relief access.  

  • Publish annual impact reports and adjust policy as needed. 

 

(3.10.5) Scalability Plan Beyond Year 4  

To ensure long-term impact and adaptability, the ACCESS+CHOR Resilience Package includes a forward-looking scalability strategy:  

 

(3.10.5.1) Federal Program Integration Roadmap  

  • Medicare and Medicaid Linkages: Explore integration with healthcare affordability programs to support seniors and low-income individuals facing both housing and medical hardship.  

  • Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC): Coordinate with the IRS to align ACCESS eligibility with EITC recipients, streamlining outreach and application processes for working families.  

  • Workforce Development Programs: Partner with the Department of Labor to embed housing stability metrics into job training and employment support initiatives.  

 

(3.10.5.2) State-Level Customization  

  • Flexible Implementation Models: Allow states to tailor CHOR certification criteria, rent burden thresholds, and repayment incentives based on local housing markets and administrative capacity.  

  • State Innovation Grants: Provide competitive funding to states that pilot innovative ACCESS+CHOR adaptations, such as integration with state-run housing trust funds or digital ID systems.  

 

(3.10.5.3) International Replication Potential  

  • Global Policy Exchange: Collaborate with international housing and social protection agencies to share best practices and explore adaptation in countries with similar social insurance systems.  

  • Pilot Partnerships: Engage with multilateral organizations (e.g., UN-Habitat, World Bank) to test ACCESS+CHOR-inspired models in urban centers facing housing insecurity and informal labor challenges.  

 

This roadmap ensures that the ACCESS+CHOR framework remains dynamic, scalable, and globally relevant. 

THE COLLABORATION: ACCESS+CHOR

4.0 COMPARABLE PROGRAMS AND POLICY ADVANTAGE 

(4.1.0) Comparable Programs and How ACCESS+CHOR Is Better  

While the ACCESS+CHOR Resilience Package draws inspiration from several existing federal and local programs, it offers a more integrated, scalable, and sustainable solution to housing and financial insecurity. Below is a comparison of similar programs and how this proposal improves upon them. 

 

1. Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program (HUD)  

  • What it does: Provides rental assistance to low-income families, allowing them to choose housing in the private market.  

  • Limitations:  

  • Long waitlists (often years).  

  • Limited funding and availability.  

  • Landlord participation is inconsistent.  

  • ACCESS+CHOR Advantage:  

  • Integrates housing support with earned Social Security access, not just subsidies.  

  • Offers developer incentives to expand affordable housing stock.  

  • Uses real-time rent burden data to qualify tenants, reducing delays.  

   

2. Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC)  

  • What it does: Offers tax credits to developers to build or rehabilitate affordable housing.  

  • Limitations:  

  • Affordability often limited to 60% AMI (Area Median Income).  

  • No direct tenant support or income-based rent models.  

  • ACCESS+CHOR Advantage:  

  • Combines developer incentives with tenant-centered rent models.  

  • Ties rent to actual income, not just AMI thresholds.  

  • Provides financial relief through SSA for rent-burdened tenants.  

  
3. 401(k) Hardship Withdrawals  

  • What it does: Allows early withdrawals from retirement accounts for specific hardships.  

  • Limitations:  

  • Penalties and taxes apply.  

  • Only available to those with private retirement savings.  

  • ACCESS+CHOR Advantage:  

  • Applies to all workers with SSA contributions, including gig workers and low-wage earners.  

  • No penalties — just proportional reduction in future benefits.  

  • Includes repayment options via tax refunds.  

  

4. Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF)  

  • What it does: Provides cash assistance to low-income families with children.  

  • Limitations:  

  • Strict eligibility requirements.  

  • Time-limited benefits.  

  • Often stigmatized and underfunded.  

  • ACCESS+CHOR Advantage:  

  • Empowers individuals to access their own earned benefits.  

  • Reduces stigma by framing support as earned, not given.  

  • Offers housing stability, which TANF does not directly address.  

  

5. Employer-Assisted Housing Programs  

  • What they do: Employers provide housing stipends or down payment assistance.  

  • Limitations:  

  • Voluntary and inconsistent across industries.  

  • Often limited to higher-income or skilled workers.  

  • ACCESS+CHOR Advantage:  

  • Systemic and scalable through federal policy.  

  • Prioritizes essential workers and low-income earners.  

  • Encourages employer participation through CHOR incentives.  

  

6. COVID-19 Emergency Rental Assistance Programs  

  • What they did: Provided temporary rental relief during the pandemic.  

  • Limitations:  

  • One-time or short-term funding.  

  • Emergency-based, not systemic.  

  • ACCESS+CHOR Advantage:  

  • Permanent infrastructure for rent relief tied to SSA.  

  • Built-in repayment and reinvestment mechanisms.  

  • Designed for long-term resilience, not just crisis response. 

COMPARABLE PROGRAMS AND POLICY ADVANTAGE

5.0 EQUITY LENS  

The ACCESS+CHOR Resilience Package is designed with a strong equity framework to ensure that historically marginalized and underserved communities benefit equitably from its implementation.  

 

  • Racial Equity: Black and Latino households are disproportionately rent-burdened and underrepresented in homeownership. CHOR’s income-based rent models and ACCESS’s earned-benefit structure help close racial wealth and housing gaps by providing targeted relief without stigma.  

  • Geographic Equity: The pilot and expansion phases prioritize urban, suburban, and rural regions alike, ensuring that housing affordability and Social Security access are not limited by ZIP code.  

  • Generational Equity: Younger workers, gig economy participants, and caregivers - many of whom are excluded from traditional retirement systems — gain access to their earned benefits when they need them most, without compromising long-term retirement security. 

EQUITY LENS

6.0 LEGISLATIVE PATHWAY  

To enact the ACCESS+CHOR Resilience Package, a coordinated legislative strategy is required. This dual-policy framework intersects with both Social Security and housing policy, necessitating collaboration across multiple congressional committees and federal agencies.  

 

(6.1.0) Legal and Constitutional Considerations  
The ACCESS+CHOR Resilience Package introduces innovative mechanisms that intersect with federal entitlement programs, tax policy, and housing law. As such, it may face legal scrutiny on several fronts:  

  • Early Access to Federal Entitlements: Allowing early, conditional access to Social Security benefits may raise questions about statutory authority and the original intent of the Social Security Act. To mitigate this, the ACCESS Act should be framed as a structured, earned-access mechanism — not a redefinition of entitlement eligibility — and should include explicit legislative language authorizing such withdrawals under hardship conditions.  

  • Tax Refund Reinvestment: Redirecting a portion of federal tax refunds to repay SSA withdrawals must be clearly defined as voluntary (opt-out) to avoid legal challenges related to involuntary taxation or appropriation.  

  • Data Sharing and Privacy: Sharing rent burden data between CHOR housing providers, SSA, and IRS must comply with the Privacy Act of 1974 and relevant data protection laws. Consent-based, encrypted data-sharing protocols should be codified in the legislation.  

  • Equal Protection and Non-Discrimination: The program must ensure that eligibility criteria and implementation do not disproportionately exclude or burden protected classes. A legal review should be conducted to ensure compliance with the Equal Protection Clause and the Fair Housing Act.  

 

To proactively address these concerns, the proposal recommends:  

  • A legal review by the Congressional Research Service (CRS) and/or Government Accountability Office (GAO).  

  • Inclusion of a severability clause to preserve the remainder of the legislation if any provision is struck down.  

  • Ongoing legal oversight during pilot implementation to identify and resolve emerging issues. 

 

(6.2.0) Key Committees of Jurisdiction:  

  • House Ways and Means Committee  

    • Oversees Social Security legislation and tax-related provisions, including the refund reinvestment mechanism in the ACCESS Act.  

  • Senate Finance Committee  

    • Has jurisdiction over Social Security, tax policy, and public assistance programs.  

  • House and Senate Committees on Appropriations  

    • Responsible for funding pilot programs, administrative infrastructure, and interagency coordination.  

  • House Financial Services Committee & Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee  

    • Oversee housing policy, including the CHOR Act’s zoning, affordability, and developer incentive provisions.  

  • Joint Economic Committee  

    • May be engaged to evaluate the economic impact and fiscal sustainability of the integrated model.  

  

(6.3.0) Legislative Vehicles:  

  • Standalone Legislation: Introduce the ACCESS and CHOR Acts as a combined or companion bill package.  

  • Budget Reconciliation: If structured to impact federal revenues or outlays, elements of the proposal could be included in a reconciliation bill.  

  • Amendments to Existing Acts: Integrate provisions into reauthorizations of the Social Security Act, Housing and Community Development Act, or IRS modernization legislation. 

 

(6.4.0) Model Legislative Language Summary  

To accelerate bipartisan support and streamline the legislative process, the ACCESS+CHOR Resilience Package includes a model legislative appendix. Key components include:  

  • Title and Purpose: “To authorize early access to earned Social Security benefits under verified hardship and to expand access to income-based housing through CHOR-certified providers.”  

  • Definitions: Clear statutory definitions for “verified hardship,” “CHOR-certified housing,” “earned benefit access,” and “rent burden.”  

  • Eligibility Criteria: Income thresholds, rent burden ratios, and documentation requirements for both ACCESS and CHOR participation.  

  • Safeguards and Repayment: Provisions for refund-based repayment, payroll deductions, and proportional benefit reductions.  

  • Data Sharing and Privacy: Consent-based, encrypted data-sharing protocols between SSA, HUD, IRS, and CHOR providers.  

  • Oversight and Reporting: Establishment of a Policy Innovation Council and mandatory annual reporting to Congress.  

 

A full legislative appendix with draft bill text is available upon request for congressional offices and legal counsel.  

  

(6.5.0) Suggested Bipartisan Legislative Champions  

To ensure broad political support, the proposal recommends identifying co-sponsors from both parties with a track record in housing, Social Security, or economic resilience:  

Democratic Champions:  

  • Members of the House Financial Services Committee or Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee with a focus on housing equity.  

  • Representatives from urban districts with high rent burden and ALICE populations.  

Republican Champions:  

  • Lawmakers focused on workforce development, retirement security, or rural housing.  

  • Members of the House Ways and Means or Senate Finance Committees with interest in Social Security reform.  

 

Potential bipartisan leaders could include those who have previously supported:  

  • Earned benefit access reforms.  

  • Employer-assisted housing initiatives.  

  • Public-private partnerships in housing or retirement policy. 

LEGISLATIVE PATHWAY

7.0 FUNDING SOURCES & FISCAL STRATEGY 

The ACCESS+CHOR Resilience Package is designed to be fiscally responsible and sustainable. It leverages existing federal infrastructure and funding streams while introducing innovative mechanisms to offset costs.  

 

(7.1.0) Primary Funding Sources  

  • Social Security Trust Fund (ACCESS withdrawals)  

    • Early access is limited to 25% of projected benefits.  

    • Withdrawals are repaid through tax refunds and voluntary contributions.  

    • Future benefits are proportionally reduced to maintain trust fund solvency.  

  • Reallocation of Existing Housing Funds  

    • Redirect underutilized or overlapping HUD funds (e.g., CDBG, HOME).  

    • Prioritize CHOR-certified developments in federal housing grants.  

  • Public-Private Partnerships (CHOR)  

    • Leverage LIHTC, land donations, and employer-assisted housing models.  

    • Encourage private investment through tax incentives and zoning bonuses.  

  • Refund Reinvestment Mechanism  

    • Default 5% of federal tax refunds redirected to SSA accounts (opt-out).  

    • Allow general allocation of tax refunds to SSA accounts from those who didn’t withdraw from their SSA.  

    • Generates an estimated $2.4 billion annually in voluntary contributions.  

  • Administrative Efficiency  

    • Shared infrastructure between SSA, HUD, and IRS reduces overhead.  

    • Digital systems streamline eligibility, verification, and reporting. 

 

(7.2.0) Long-Term Solvency Modeling  
While the ACCESS+CHOR framework includes repayment mechanisms such as tax refund redirection and voluntary payroll contributions, a more detailed actuarial analysis is essential to assess the long-term impact on the Social Security Trust Fund.  

 

It is recommended that the Social Security Administration, in collaboration with independent actuaries and the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), conduct simulations to model various usage scenarios. These should include:  

  • Projected uptake rates across income brackets and age groups.  

  • Repayment success rates under different economic conditions.  

  • Impact on the Trust Fund’s solvency horizon under low, moderate, and high utilization.  

 

These projections will strengthen the fiscal case for the ACCESS Act and help policymakers calibrate withdrawal caps, eligibility thresholds, and repayment timelines to ensure sustainability. 

FUNDING SOURCES & FISCAL STRATEGY

8.0 THE IMPACT ON WELFARE RECIPIENTS  

The integration of the CHOR and ACCESS Acts offers significant benefits for individuals currently receiving public assistance, particularly those in the ALICE (Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed) population.  

  

(8.1.0) Positive Effects  

  • Reduced Rent Burden  
    CHOR’s income-based rent models ensure that low-income households spend no more than 30% of their income on housing, freeing up resources for food, healthcare, and transportation.  

  • Stabilized Living Conditions  
    Stable housing reduces the likelihood of eviction, homelessness, and frequent relocations, which are common barriers to employment and education.  

  • Pathway to Self-Sufficiency  
    ACCESS allows welfare recipients to tap into their earned Social Security contributions during hardship, reducing reliance on programs like TANF and SNAP.  

  • Improved Credit and Financial Health  
    Avoiding eviction and high-interest debt through SSA rent relief helps recipients build better credit and long-term financial stability.  

  

(8.2.0) Cautions and Mitigation  

(8.2.1) Benefit Cliffs  
As income increases, recipients may lose eligibility for certain welfare programs too quickly.  

  • Solution: Coordinate CHOR and ACCESS with welfare agencies to implement gradual phase-outs and benefit transition planning.  

 

(8.2.2) Administrative Overlap  
Navigating multiple programs can be confusing for recipients.  

  • Solution: Provide case management and digital tools that integrate housing, SSA access, and welfare eligibility in one platform. 

 

(8.3.0) Workforce Integration Strategy 

(8.3.1) Policy Coordination with Workforce Development 

  • Housing + Employment Linkages: Partner with workforce development agencies to align housing access with job placement programs. 

  • Supportive Services: Integrate job training, childcare, and transportation assistance into housing initiatives. 

  • Employer Partnerships: Collaborate with local employers to identify housing needs and offer location-based incentives. 

  • Benefit Transition Planning: Coordinate with welfare agencies to prevent benefit cliffs and support gradual transitions to employment. 

 

(8.3.1.1) Rationale 

This strategy ensures that housing stability contributes directly to economic mobility, especially for welfare recipients and essential workers. 

 

(8.4.0) Case Studies and Employer Quotes  

Case Study: Employer-Assisted Housing in Scott County, Minnesota  

Scott County partnered with local employers to launch an Employer-Assisted Housing (EAH) program targeting essential workers in healthcare, education, and manufacturing. Employers contributed to down payment assistance and rental subsidies, helping employees live closer to work. The initiative improved retention rates and reduced commute times, with participating businesses reporting a 15–20% increase in employee satisfaction and retention.  

 

“We saw a direct improvement in morale and productivity when our staff could afford to live near their workplace. It’s a win-win for the community and the company.”  
— HR Director, Regional Healthcare System (Scott County EAH Program)  

   

Case Study: Housing America’s Workforce – Urban Land Institute  

The Urban Land Institute’s report, Housing America’s Workforce, highlights 18 successful workforce housing projects across the U.S. These include mixed-income developments near employment centers, supported by public-private partnerships and employer engagement. Projects in cities like Denver, Atlanta, and San Diego demonstrated that proximity to work and affordability are key drivers of workforce stability.  

 

“Our investment in workforce housing has helped us attract and retain talent in a competitive market. Employees value the stability and convenience.”  
— VP of Operations, Denver-based Tech Firm (ULI Case Study)  

 

San Diego, CA – Civita Development  
Integrated housing and transit access for workforce families.  

  • “Housing near transit and jobs is a game-changer for our workforce.”  
    — Project Manager, Sudberry Properties   

 

Atlanta, GA – Atlanta Land Trust  
Community land trust model preserved affordability and supported essential workers.  

  • “We’re keeping families in their neighborhoods and close to work.”  
    — Executive Director, ALT  

 

Austin, TX – Affordability Unlocked Program  
Zoning reform enabled rapid development of workforce housing.  

  • “The program helped us build faster and house more teachers and nurses.”  
    — Developer, Austin Housing Coalition   

 

Burlington, VT – Champlain Housing Trust  
CLT model supported long-term affordability and economic mobility.  

  • “Stable housing gave our employees the confidence to pursue career growth.”  
    — Local Employer Partner   

 

Chicago, IL – University of Chicago Employer Housing Assistance  
Provided forgivable loans for employees buying homes near campus.  

  • “It’s a smart investment in our people and our community.”  
    — VP of Human Resources, University of Chicago   

 

New York City, NY – Inclusionary Housing Program  
Developers offered affordable units near hospitals and schools.  

  • “We’ve seen better retention among our nursing staff since housing became accessible.”  
    — Hospital Administrator   

 

Seattle, WA – Amazon Housing Equity Fund  
Invested \$2 billion in affordable housing near employment hubs.  

  • “Housing is essential infrastructure for a thriving workforce.”  
    — Amazon Real Estate Executive   

 

Minneapolis, MN – Employer Housing Partnership  
Employers collaborated with nonprofits to support housing for low-wage workers.  

  • “It’s helped us reduce turnover and build a stronger team.”  
    — Restaurant Owner   

 

Portland, OR – Workforce Housing Incentive Program  
Provided tax incentives for housing near industrial zones.  

  • “Our employees are more punctual and less stressed.”  
    — Manufacturing Plant Manager   

 

Philadelphia, PA – Temple University Housing Assistance  
Offered rental support for faculty and staff.  

  • “It’s a retention tool and a community investment.”  
    — Director of Campus Services  

 

Raleigh, NC – Wake County Affordable Housing Plan  
Integrated housing with workforce development and transit.  

  • “We’re seeing real progress in workforce stability.”  
    — County Housing Director   

 

Salt Lake City, UT – Public-Private Housing Partnership  
Employers contributed to housing trust fund for essential workers.  

  • “It’s a shared responsibility—and it’s working.”  
    — CEO, Regional Utility Company   

 

Oakland, CA – Tech Firm Housing Subsidy Program  
Provided monthly housing stipends for entry-level employees.  

  • “It’s helped us compete for talent and support our team’s well-being.”  
    — HR Manager, Bay Area Startup   

 

(8.5.0) Expanding Case Study Representation  
While the current case studies highlight successful urban and employer-driven housing initiatives, the ACCESS+CHOR framework would benefit from the inclusion of examples from rural and tribal communities. These areas often face unique housing challenges, including limited infrastructure, geographic isolation, and underinvestment.  

 

Future pilot programs and evaluations should prioritize:  

  • Rural Workforce Housing: Highlighting partnerships with agricultural employers, rural health systems, and school districts to support essential workers in remote areas.  

  • Tribal Housing Initiatives: Collaborating with Tribal Housing Authorities to integrate CHOR principles into existing programs under the Native American Housing Assistance and Self Determination Act (NAHASDA).  

  • Appalachian and Delta Region Models: Documenting how income-based rent models and SSA access can stabilize housing in economically distressed regions.  

 

Including these perspectives will broaden the policy’s appeal, ensure geographic equity, and demonstrate its adaptability across diverse community contexts. 

THE IMPACT ON WELFARE RECIPIENTS

9.0 STAKEHOLDER ROLES 

The successful implementation of the ACCESS+CHOR Resilience Package depends on the coordinated efforts of multiple stakeholders, each with distinct responsibilities:  

 

  • Social Security Administration (SSA)  
    Administers early access to benefits, manages the refund reinvestment ledger, and integrates rent burden data into eligibility systems.  

  • Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)  
    Oversees CHOR program compliance, monitors housing affordability metrics, and coordinates with local housing authorities.  

  • Internal Revenue Service (IRS)  
    Updates tax forms to include refund contribution options, processes refund redirection, and shares data with SSA.  

  • Developers and Housing Providers  
    Participate in CHOR-certified projects, implement income-based rent models, and report rent burden data to HUD and SSA.  

  • Nonprofit Organizations and Community Partners  
    Provide financial counseling, tenant education, and outreach to ensure equitable access and informed participation.  

  • Employers and Workforce Agencies  
    Collaborate on employer-assisted housing, identify workforce housing needs, and support benefit transition planning. 

STAKEHOLDER ROLES

10.0 MONITORING & EVALUATION 

To ensure accountability, transparency, and continuous improvement, the ACCESS+CHOR Resilience Package includes a robust monitoring and evaluation framework.  

 

(10.1.0) Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) 

1. Rent-to-Income Ratio  

Definition: Percentage of household income spent on rent.  

Target: ≤30% for all CHOR participants.  

Purpose: Measures housing affordability and effectiveness of income-based rent models.  

Data Source: CHOR housing provider reports and tenant income documentation.  

 

2. SSA Withdrawal Repayment Rate  

Definition: Percentage of early Social Security withdrawals repaid via tax refunds or voluntary contributions.  

Target: ≥75% repayment within 3 years.  

Purpose: Ensures fiscal sustainability of the ACCESS program.  

Data Source: SSA refund tracking system and IRS tax return data.  

 

3. Eviction and Displacement Rates  

Definition: Annual rate of eviction filings and resident turnover in CHOR-supported housing.  

Target: 20% reduction in eviction rates in pilot areas within 2 years.  

Purpose: Measures housing stability and tenant retention.  

Data Source: Local housing courts, CHOR landlord reports, and HUD data.  

 

4. Workforce Retention and Proximity  

Definition: Percentage of essential workers housed within 5 miles of their workplace.  

Target: ≥75% of essential workers in CHOR housing meet this proximity standard.  

Purpose: Supports workforce stability and reduces commute-related stress.  

Data Source: Employer surveys, CHOR tenant records, and GIS mapping.  

 

5. Public Assistance Reduction  

Definition: Decrease in use of TANF, SNAP, and emergency housing services among participants.  

Target: 30% reduction in public assistance reliance within 3 years.  

Purpose: Demonstrates the program’s impact on self-sufficiency.  

Data Source: State and federal welfare program databases.  

 

6. Program Participation and Awareness  

Definition: Number of eligible individuals who apply for and use ACCESS or CHOR benefits.  

Target: 60% participation rate in pilot regions within the first 18 months.  

Purpose: Measures outreach effectiveness and accessibility.  

Data Source: SSA and CHOR application portals, public awareness campaign metrics.  

 

7. Administrative Processing Time  

Definition: Average time from application to benefit disbursement.  

Target: ≤30 days for ACCESS withdrawals and CHOR housing placement.  

Purpose: Evaluates efficiency and responsiveness.  

Data Source: SSA and CHOR administrative logs.  

 

8. Tenant Satisfaction and Financial Health  

Definition: Self-reported satisfaction with housing and financial stability.  

Target: ≥80% satisfaction rate in annual surveys.  

Purpose: Captures qualitative impact and identifies areas for improvement.  

Data Source: Annual tenant surveys and credit score tracking (with consent). 

 

9. Digital Access Equity  
Definition: Percentage of applications submitted via mobile, desktop, and paper-based formats.  
Target: At least 40% of applications submitted via mobile and ≤20% via paper, indicating digital accessibility and inclusion.  
Purpose: Measures the accessibility and usability of the SSA portal across different platforms, especially for low-income and digitally underserved populations.  
Data Source: SSA application system analytics and intake logs.  

  

(10.2.0) Continuous Feedback Loop  

To ensure the ACCESS+CHOR framework evolves with user needs and remains responsive:  

  • User Experience Surveys: Conduct quarterly surveys of applicants and tenants to assess satisfaction, identify barriers, and gather suggestions.  

  • Community Listening Sessions: Host virtual and in-person forums in pilot regions to collect qualitative feedback from diverse stakeholders.  

  • Feedback Integration Protocol: Establish a formal process for incorporating user feedback into policy updates, system design, and outreach strategies, overseen by the Policy Innovation Council. 

 

(10.3.0) Evaluation Mechanisms 

  • Third-Party Audits: Annual independent reviews of financial, operational, and social outcomes.  

  • Academic Partnerships: Longitudinal studies conducted with universities to assess long-term impact.  

  • Public Dashboards: Transparent reporting of program metrics, updated quarterly.  

  • Congressional Reporting: Annual reports submitted to relevant committees detailing participation, outcomes, and fiscal impact. 

MONITORING & EVALUATION

11.0 CONCLUSION  

The integration of the ACCESS Act and the CHOR Act represents a bold, innovative step toward solving two of America’s most pressing challenges: financial insecurity and housing instability. By allowing citizens to access their earned Social Security contributions during times of verified hardship — particularly when facing unsustainable rent burdens — this dual-policy framework empowers individuals with dignity, autonomy, and real-time relief.  

 

At the same time, CHOR’s community-anchored housing model ensures that affordable, inclusive, and stable housing is not just a goal, but a reality — especially for essential workers and vulnerable populations. Together, these policies create a feedback loop of economic resilience: stable housing supports employment, employment supports contributions, and contributions support future security.  

 

This is not just a policy package — it is a modern social contract that honors the contributions of working Americans and invests in their ability to thrive today, not just survive tomorrow. 

 

(11.1.0) Call to Action 

We urge lawmakers, agency leaders, and community stakeholders to act with urgency and vision:  

 

  • Legislators: Introduce and champion the ACCESS+CHOR Resilience Package as a bipartisan solution to economic and housing insecurity.  

  • Federal Agencies: Begin interagency coordination between SSA, HUD, IRS, and local housing authorities to pilot and scale this integrated model.  

  • Employers and Developers: Partner with CHOR-certified programs to support workforce housing and economic mobility.  

  • Advocates and Nonprofits: Mobilize public awareness campaigns to educate citizens about their rights, benefits, and opportunities under this framework.  

  • Citizens: Demand policies that reflect your lived realities — policies that treat your contributions with respect and your needs with urgency.  

 

The time to act is not in the next crisis — it is now. Let us build a future where no one has to choose between rent and survival, and where every American has access to the security they’ve already earned.  

CONCLUSION
bottom of page